<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Divorce Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2005/01/21/divorce-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2005/01/21/divorce-bill/</link>
	<description>Making the baby Jesus cry since 2002.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2005/01/21/divorce-bill/#comment-23594</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amber.tangerinecs.com/?p=338#comment-23594</guid>
		<description>I think the conversation had drifted away from being confined solely to the bill, and more about perceptions about divorce in our society in general.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;And while probably the bill has good intentions (looking out for the children -- which I think we would all support), I think it's too broad and kind of naive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the conversation had drifted away from being confined solely to the bill, and more about perceptions about divorce in our society in general.</p>
<p>And while probably the bill has good intentions (looking out for the children &#8212; which I think we would all support), I think it&#8217;s too broad and kind of naive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bly</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2005/01/21/divorce-bill/#comment-23593</link>
		<dc:creator>Bly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amber.tangerinecs.com/?p=338#comment-23593</guid>
		<description>I read the bill, and I am not seeing how this is an example of someone thinking "that if it's not right for them, then it's not right for anyone". I see it as hoping to educate two people who have chosen divorce. It would give the parents at least 4 hours of time to sit and think about their children and the situation they are in. And I am not that they haven't already done that.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I don't see the bill as people trying to convert others. I see it as looking out for the children who do not have a voice. And I was one of them.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;So, other than possibly infringing on someone's liberty, I do not see this as being a judgement passed on anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the bill, and I am not seeing how this is an example of someone thinking &#8220;that if it&#8217;s not right for them, then it&#8217;s not right for anyone&#8221;. I see it as hoping to educate two people who have chosen divorce. It would give the parents at least 4 hours of time to sit and think about their children and the situation they are in. And I am not that they haven&#8217;t already done that.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see the bill as people trying to convert others. I see it as looking out for the children who do not have a voice. And I was one of them.</p>
<p>So, other than possibly infringing on someone&#8217;s liberty, I do not see this as being a judgement passed on anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2005/01/21/divorce-bill/#comment-23592</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amber.tangerinecs.com/?p=338#comment-23592</guid>
		<description>Well, that makes sense to you and me and most of my readers, Hillary. I mean, it seems like perfect common sense. Unfortunately, there are some people out there who are of the mind that if it's not right for &lt;b&gt;them&lt;/b&gt;, then it's not right for &lt;b&gt;anyone&lt;/b&gt;. These people can't grasp that just because their religion dictates certain things, other people who don't subscribe to that religion don't have to follow those dictates. Instead they think their way is the only right way and they want to convert everybody in the world, and as far as they're concerned that's the only possible solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that makes sense to you and me and most of my readers, Hillary. I mean, it seems like perfect common sense. Unfortunately, there are some people out there who are of the mind that if it&#8217;s not right for <b>them</b>, then it&#8217;s not right for <b>anyone</b>. These people can&#8217;t grasp that just because their religion dictates certain things, other people who don&#8217;t subscribe to that religion don&#8217;t have to follow those dictates. Instead they think their way is the only right way and they want to convert everybody in the world, and as far as they&#8217;re concerned that&#8217;s the only possible solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2005/01/21/divorce-bill/#comment-23591</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amber.tangerinecs.com/?p=338#comment-23591</guid>
		<description>And but also, while marriage is a Christian thing for a lot of people, for many others, it's not. It's religious for some and not for others, and it seems to me that dissolving a purely civil marriage is less of a big deal in a way, isn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And but also, while marriage is a Christian thing for a lot of people, for many others, it&#8217;s not. It&#8217;s religious for some and not for others, and it seems to me that dissolving a purely civil marriage is less of a big deal in a way, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jmac</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2005/01/21/divorce-bill/#comment-23590</link>
		<dc:creator>Jmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amber.tangerinecs.com/?p=338#comment-23590</guid>
		<description>I agree Amber - and I especially agree with Adrian's analogy - and I'm glad you didn't think that I was trying to tout my marriage or say that I'm better, since that wasn't my intent. In hindsight, I kinda feared that might be the impression I was giving and I'm glad that's not how you took it.

&lt;br&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Encouraging people to "take marriage more seriously" is an idea with good intentions, but I don't know how effective it would be in reducing the number of divorces -- or I should say, significantly reducing the number of divorces.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;br&gt;I concur. While I do think that there are some people who do trivalize the institution, I don't know if there really is a surefire way to fix it. And I can't say that if people bought in to good, old-fashioned Christian values they'd be more successful or have 'better' marriages because according to the Barna Report, 'born-again' Christians rank just at the top of the divorce rate list.

&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;There isn't a magic bullet to remedy this problem. The best thing is maturity, committment and love ... but sometimes even that isn't everything.

&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;Sometimes it is better for both parties to separate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Amber - and I especially agree with Adrian&#8217;s analogy - and I&#8217;m glad you didn&#8217;t think that I was trying to tout my marriage or say that I&#8217;m better, since that wasn&#8217;t my intent. In hindsight, I kinda feared that might be the impression I was giving and I&#8217;m glad that&#8217;s not how you took it.</p>
<p></p>
<blockquote><p>Encouraging people to &#8220;take marriage more seriously&#8221; is an idea with good intentions, but I don&#8217;t know how effective it would be in reducing the number of divorces &#8212; or I should say, significantly reducing the number of divorces.</p></blockquote>
<p>I concur. While I do think that there are some people who do trivalize the institution, I don&#8217;t know if there really is a surefire way to fix it. And I can&#8217;t say that if people bought in to good, old-fashioned Christian values they&#8217;d be more successful or have &#8216;better&#8217; marriages because according to the Barna Report, &#8216;born-again&#8217; Christians rank just at the top of the divorce rate list.</p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t a magic bullet to remedy this problem. The best thing is maturity, committment and love &#8230; but sometimes even that isn&#8217;t everything.</p>
<p>Sometimes it is better for both parties to separate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2005/01/21/divorce-bill/#comment-23589</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amber.tangerinecs.com/?p=338#comment-23589</guid>
		<description>Exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2005/01/21/divorce-bill/#comment-23588</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amber.tangerinecs.com/?p=338#comment-23588</guid>
		<description>The way that some people might get on the marriage high horse and cite their own marriage as an example -- though it is cleary understood that none of the present company has done that -- is done in the same way that someone might get on a high horse about hard work and applying oneself, citing one's own career advancement or steady employment -- while disregarding the factor that opportunity and luck play. Shit does happen, foiling your own plans and commitment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way that some people might get on the marriage high horse and cite their own marriage as an example &#8212; though it is cleary understood that none of the present company has done that &#8212; is done in the same way that someone might get on a high horse about hard work and applying oneself, citing one&#8217;s own career advancement or steady employment &#8212; while disregarding the factor that opportunity and luck play. Shit does happen, foiling your own plans and commitment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2005/01/21/divorce-bill/#comment-23587</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 06:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amber.tangerinecs.com/?p=338#comment-23587</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I take marriage seriously (as, I'm sure, all you do) in that I truly believe that my marriage is something which will last throughout my lifetime. I would never imagine simply walking away from my marriage - either from frustration or from a wanting of something else for my life. I am dedicated to my wife and to our committment and I will do whatever it takes to make our marriage work. Marriage is going to be hard sometimes, and I just don't appreciate the notion that it's something which is to be taken lightly. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;br&gt;Sorry for the long quoted section. Couldn't find any of it to take out, though. It's all relevant to my comment.

&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;And Jmac, let me start by saying I know that you don't think divorce is always wrong, or those who get divorced are flawed in some way. You've made that clear. So my comment isn't about &lt;b&gt;you&lt;/b&gt;.

&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;I also truly believe the sentiments you expressed in the section of your comment that I quoted. I know that you believe these things strongly and aren't just saying them for the heck of it, but because it is very important to you. I also know that you don't think you're "better" than anybody because you are married.

&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;The problem is this. I feel like there &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt; people out there who &lt;b&gt;do&lt;/b&gt; just say things like that because they like the way it sounds, they think it makes them sound so sanctified and special, and they like to get up on their high horse and act like they're so much better than anybody who's ever gotten a divorce, because they &lt;em&gt;know&lt;/em&gt; the importance of marriage and they take it seriously and they're not going to just walk away if things get tough, no sirree bob! To them, people who've gotten a divorce have a stigma. They're not as good. They have a flaw of character somehow -- they didn't try hard enough, or they're weak, or selfish, or childish. And that's that.

&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;But nothing is ever that simple. I'm not saying there aren't cases of divorce that are clear-cut, with the people just deciding to give up, or one partner flat-out being an asshole. BUT. What it comes down to is this. You can never predict what will happen in the future. You can't know what will happen tomorrow, a year from now, 5 years from now, and so on. When I got married I believed my marriage would last forever. Chris and I got married because we were seriously committed to each other and wanted to spend the rest of our lives together as a married couple. Jmac, just like you truly believe that your marriage is something which will last throughout  your lifetime, so did I.

&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;Encouraging people to "take marriage more seriously" is an idea with good intentions, but I don't know how effective it would be in reducing the number of divorces -- or I should say, &lt;b&gt;significantly&lt;/b&gt; reducing the number of divorces. My marriage was not something I entered into lightly. I took it VERY seriously. If anyone had come along and tried to tell me to stop, wait a little longer, think about it more, I would have told them they don't know what the hell they're talking about and they don't know ME, because that's exactly what I had done. And looking back, I can't see that it could've happened any other way. And I don't regret anything. "Waiting" or "thinking about it more"... none of that would've prevented what ultimately was the result. Shit happens, you know? And not just simple shit that people can dismiss as an example of partners "just giving up." LIFE happens. And -- at the risk of sounding unbelievably cliche -- we have no way of knowing what twists and turns it will take next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I take marriage seriously (as, I&#8217;m sure, all you do) in that I truly believe that my marriage is something which will last throughout my lifetime. I would never imagine simply walking away from my marriage - either from frustration or from a wanting of something else for my life. I am dedicated to my wife and to our committment and I will do whatever it takes to make our marriage work. Marriage is going to be hard sometimes, and I just don&#8217;t appreciate the notion that it&#8217;s something which is to be taken lightly. </p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry for the long quoted section. Couldn&#8217;t find any of it to take out, though. It&#8217;s all relevant to my comment.</p>
<p>And Jmac, let me start by saying I know that you don&#8217;t think divorce is always wrong, or those who get divorced are flawed in some way. You&#8217;ve made that clear. So my comment isn&#8217;t about <b>you</b>.</p>
<p>I also truly believe the sentiments you expressed in the section of your comment that I quoted. I know that you believe these things strongly and aren&#8217;t just saying them for the heck of it, but because it is very important to you. I also know that you don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re &#8220;better&#8221; than anybody because you are married.</p>
<p>The problem is this. I feel like there <b>are</b> people out there who <b>do</b> just say things like that because they like the way it sounds, they think it makes them sound so sanctified and special, and they like to get up on their high horse and act like they&#8217;re so much better than anybody who&#8217;s ever gotten a divorce, because they <em>know</em> the importance of marriage and they take it seriously and they&#8217;re not going to just walk away if things get tough, no sirree bob! To them, people who&#8217;ve gotten a divorce have a stigma. They&#8217;re not as good. They have a flaw of character somehow &#8212; they didn&#8217;t try hard enough, or they&#8217;re weak, or selfish, or childish. And that&#8217;s that.</p>
<p>But nothing is ever that simple. I&#8217;m not saying there aren&#8217;t cases of divorce that are clear-cut, with the people just deciding to give up, or one partner flat-out being an asshole. BUT. What it comes down to is this. You can never predict what will happen in the future. You can&#8217;t know what will happen tomorrow, a year from now, 5 years from now, and so on. When I got married I believed my marriage would last forever. Chris and I got married because we were seriously committed to each other and wanted to spend the rest of our lives together as a married couple. Jmac, just like you truly believe that your marriage is something which will last throughout  your lifetime, so did I.</p>
<p>Encouraging people to &#8220;take marriage more seriously&#8221; is an idea with good intentions, but I don&#8217;t know how effective it would be in reducing the number of divorces &#8212; or I should say, <b>significantly</b> reducing the number of divorces. My marriage was not something I entered into lightly. I took it VERY seriously. If anyone had come along and tried to tell me to stop, wait a little longer, think about it more, I would have told them they don&#8217;t know what the hell they&#8217;re talking about and they don&#8217;t know ME, because that&#8217;s exactly what I had done. And looking back, I can&#8217;t see that it could&#8217;ve happened any other way. And I don&#8217;t regret anything. &#8220;Waiting&#8221; or &#8220;thinking about it more&#8221;&#8230; none of that would&#8217;ve prevented what ultimately was the result. Shit happens, you know? And not just simple shit that people can dismiss as an example of partners &#8220;just giving up.&#8221; LIFE happens. And &#8212; at the risk of sounding unbelievably cliche &#8212; we have no way of knowing what twists and turns it will take next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2005/01/21/divorce-bill/#comment-23586</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amber.tangerinecs.com/?p=338#comment-23586</guid>
		<description>Adrian, will you marry me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian, will you marry me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2005/01/21/divorce-bill/#comment-23585</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amber.tangerinecs.com/?p=338#comment-23585</guid>
		<description>Wordy rant! Wordy rant! Yar!
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Premise, premise, premise, conclusion.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Criticism. Premise, premise, conclusion, speculation, rant.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;You know, it has been suggested that marriage licenses should come up for renewal every few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wordy rant! Wordy rant! Yar!</p>
<p>Premise, premise, premise, conclusion.</p>
<p>Criticism. Premise, premise, conclusion, speculation, rant.</p>
<p>You know, it has been suggested that marriage licenses should come up for renewal every few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
