links for 2008-03-19
-
“Is this pathological or inherent in human nature?” Um… why does it have to be either? Are those really our only two options? How about “no” to both of them? *headdesk*
-
“Can we not just accept that women are holistic beings, full of complicated desires and needs? Why is it that in order to be a good wife, we can’t be interested in sex, and those who are interested in sex clearly are not wife material?”
-
“Since the press can’t be bothered to do their homework, I’m doing it for them.”
-
“And that’s where I cut him off. Why shouldn’t clients be tested for sexually transmitted infections? They’re often the ones, as Client 9 has shown us, that ask for condomless sex.”
-
“My only complaint is that there wasn’t time. There never is. Sex work is such a complex topic and there are so many things to say and debate.”
-
“I feel like I’ve learned an awful lot about mainstream media this last week and I plan to be incredibly selective about what I say to who, and most importantly, to start ‘making the media so the media can’t make me.’”
-
“I am interested in trying to understand a very complex issue without the generalisations and the stereotypes. I’ll look at the lot and support the freedom and autonomy as much as I’ll condemn the oppression and exploitation.”
-
“There are people who are exploited and miserable in a lot of jobs. But the misery is circumstantial: not all hookers are exploited, just as not all hospital workers are exploited. It’s basic labor economics, people.”
-
Photos of tornado damage in Cabbagetown
-
“In my experience outside the South, it’s the exact opposite. For all of the talk about Boston being progressive or liberal, it’s one of the most racially regressed places I’ve ever been to.”
Mar 19 2008 07:25 pm | Category: del.icio.us links
| Comments Off