<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Version one of that thing I never sent to AlterNet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2008/06/19/version-one-of-that-thing-i-never-sent-to-alternet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2008/06/19/version-one-of-that-thing-i-never-sent-to-alternet/</link>
	<description>Making the baby Jesus cry since 2002.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Being Amber Rhea &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Body image and my photo shoot</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2008/06/19/version-one-of-that-thing-i-never-sent-to-alternet/#comment-33248</link>
		<dc:creator>Being Amber Rhea &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Body image and my photo shoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2008/06/19/version-one-of-that-thing-i-never-sent-to-alternet/#comment-33248</guid>
		<description>[...] just because I have no self-respect or want outside validation or some other bullshit. I&#8217;ve mentioned it before, but this line of &#8220;reasoning&#8221; has always baffled me. It really makes me want to bang my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just because I have no self-respect or want outside validation or some other bullshit. I&#8217;ve mentioned it before, but this line of &#8220;reasoning&#8221; has always baffled me. It really makes me want to bang my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Being Amber Rhea &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Notes</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2008/06/19/version-one-of-that-thing-i-never-sent-to-alternet/#comment-21249</link>
		<dc:creator>Being Amber Rhea &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2008/06/19/version-one-of-that-thing-i-never-sent-to-alternet/#comment-21249</guid>
		<description>[...] You can&#8217;t determine whether something is &#8220;a feminist act&#8221; based simply on the act itself. The act alone gives you no basis on which to make such a determination, because you are lacking contextual information. It&#8217;s pointless to go around arguing over whether [X] is a feminist act; what makes it a feminist act or not is all the other stuff around it - motivation, context, etc. But, I&#8217;m repeating myself. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can&#8217;t determine whether something is &#8220;a feminist act&#8221; based simply on the act itself. The act alone gives you no basis on which to make such a determination, because you are lacking contextual information. It&#8217;s pointless to go around arguing over whether [X] is a feminist act; what makes it a feminist act or not is all the other stuff around it - motivation, context, etc. But, I&#8217;m repeating myself. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny's Pennies Â» Friday food for thought</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2008/06/19/version-one-of-that-thing-i-never-sent-to-alternet/#comment-20612</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny's Pennies Â» Friday food for thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2008/06/19/version-one-of-that-thing-i-never-sent-to-alternet/#comment-20612</guid>
		<description>[...] Amber Rhea writes about feminist choices.   And even as feminists call out countless examples of male privilege, many of them continue to place a lot of importance on what men think and how men interpret things â€“ even if their interpretations are dead wrong. Somehow those interpretations are granted more importance than what the actor (the woman) states as her intent. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amber Rhea writes about feminist choices.   And even as feminists call out countless examples of male privilege, many of them continue to place a lot of importance on what men think and how men interpret things â€“ even if their interpretations are dead wrong. Somehow those interpretations are granted more importance than what the actor (the woman) states as her intent. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aspasia</title>
		<link>http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2008/06/19/version-one-of-that-thing-i-never-sent-to-alternet/#comment-20597</link>
		<dc:creator>Aspasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beingamberrhea.com/2008/06/19/version-one-of-that-thing-i-never-sent-to-alternet/#comment-20597</guid>
		<description>I don't understand this view: &lt;i&gt;she must have low self-esteem;&lt;/i&gt;. Most people I know who have low self-esteem, and certainly myself when I was afflicted with that, posing nude was not at the top of the list. Even being nude with your lover would cause anxiety for the person with low self-esteem, so why be nude for thousands, millions of people you have no connection to?

&lt;blockquote&gt;And even as feminists call out countless examples of male privilege, many of them continue to place a lot of importance on what men think and how men interpret things â€“ even if their interpretations are dead wrong. Somehow those interpretations are granted more importance than what the actor (the woman) states as her intent.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know! Yet another thing I don't understand about those specific feminists. They are so willing to remove choice from women in the realm of sex/sexuality and the expression of femininity, it's criminal. And they have the nerve to call us perpetuators of male dominance/patriarchy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand this view: <i>she must have low self-esteem;</i>. Most people I know who have low self-esteem, and certainly myself when I was afflicted with that, posing nude was not at the top of the list. Even being nude with your lover would cause anxiety for the person with low self-esteem, so why be nude for thousands, millions of people you have no connection to?</p>
<blockquote><p>And even as feminists call out countless examples of male privilege, many of them continue to place a lot of importance on what men think and how men interpret things â€“ even if their interpretations are dead wrong. Somehow those interpretations are granted more importance than what the actor (the woman) states as her intent.</p></blockquote>
<p>I know! Yet another thing I don&#8217;t understand about those specific feminists. They are so willing to remove choice from women in the realm of sex/sexuality and the expression of femininity, it&#8217;s criminal. And they have the nerve to call us perpetuators of male dominance/patriarchy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
