Powered by Twitter Tools.
Mar 31 2009 11:59 pm | Category:
Twitter tweets
|
Comments Off
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Mar 30 2009 11:59 pm | Category:
Twitter tweets
|
1 Comment »
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Mar 29 2009 11:59 pm | Category:
Twitter tweets
|
1 Comment »
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Mar 28 2009 11:59 pm | Category:
Twitter tweets
|
Comments Off
-
"My blog and Girls Gone Wild are worlds apart, and at least in the environment where I live and learn, I get neither a gold star nor a trucker hat for flashing my breasts. What I do get is a lot of judgment, slut-shaming, and the assurance that I will never land the corporate gig expected of a Harvard graduate. So why do I feel compelled to blog? Not because I’m some passive victim of the male gaze but because I want people to stop thinking about female sexuality in such a limited manner."
-
"The reason I didn’t give the book more than three stars is that the chapter about sex made me kind of furious. There is some really beautiful writing in the chapter about intersex conditions, plus some great historical illustrations. But the underpinings of the chapter are fucked up: Leroi keeps using the word 'gender' to mean the biological manifestation of reproductive organs. No. No. NO. Ugh – I really don’t understand how competent (though I guess that’s questionable) writers/researchers mix up sex and gender, especially in the biological context. Though there has been some (inconclusive) research about the link between gender identity and biological sex (the latter is the combination of hormones, chromosomes, and genitals – so the identified sex at birth doesn’t always correspond to biology), gender is an innate sense of being, NOT explicitly biological. Point being, Leroi keeps writing 'gender' when he should be using the word 'sex' – and it made me want to scream."
Mar 28 2009 07:30 am | Category:
del.icio.us links
|
Comments Off
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Mar 27 2009 11:59 pm | Category:
Twitter tweets
|
Comments Off
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Mar 26 2009 11:59 pm | Category:
Twitter tweets
|
Comments Off
-
"This is a topic that has been vital to my understanding of the world over the past few years, but it's still relatively unknown outside certain circles of activists. When I mention it as an area of my work, I almost invariably have to explain what it is. The short answer is that it is the intersection of transphobia and misogyny that specifically targets trans women. But that dry academic answer never communicates the visceral and intense experience that it is."
Mar 26 2009 07:30 am | Category:
del.icio.us links
|
Comments Off
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Mar 25 2009 11:59 pm | Category:
Twitter tweets
|
Comments Off
I’m tempted to start off w/ a long explanation of why I haven’t been blogging much lately, but I’ll save that for another time. What I want to mention now is that the second Sex 2.0 will be held in Washington, DC on May 9 (which also happens to be Rusty’s and my 4th fuckiversary; I think that’s a good omen). I can hardly believe it’s been almost a year since my dream of Sex 2.0 came to fruition! I’m not a part of the organizing team this time around, but everything is coming together and I can tell you there are some really amazing sessions lined up, including hands-on tutorials on podcasting and shooting video, discussions on identity, sexual commerce online, transparency, the sex commons, gendered implications of technology, erotica in the digital age, and my personal favorite: “How to Get Some at Cons.” Match has revamped the web site and it looks awesome. Register soon – the early bird rate ends on April 9. Those of us who were at Sex 2.0 last year can attest that it’s a damn good time. There is a block of rooms reserved at the hotel at a really good rate (the conference itself is taking place at a hotel this year). And there are some cool attendee-organized events coming together for the day before and after the conference. Join the Google group if you want to get involved and/or stay up to date on the latest developments. Hope to see you there in May!