“Every category,” eh?

An unsolicited, somewhat spammy-looking email I received this morning said:

Greetings!
Dust off your shelf and make room for a Chapeau Blog Award!

Be one of the first to enter the exclusive Chapeau Blog Award contest, solely dedicated to honoring the creative and inspired art of blogging.

Entering is an easy 2 step process.

Step 1
Enter one or many of the 12 industry categories.
There is a fit for each and every blog, including:

  • Arts & Design
  • Technology
  • Marketing & Advertising
  • Hobbies
  • Travel & Leisure
  • Entertaining
  • Health & Beauty
  • Parenting
  • Real Estate & Development
  • Finance
  • News
  • Web Design & Development

[rest of the email snipped for irrelevance to this post]

A fit for every blog? Really?

Personally I see a lot of things missing. Politics, anyone? Music? Food? And yet “Web Design & Development” is a separate category from “Technology.” And what does “Entertaining” mean?

And, of course, the perennially-missing-from-everything category: sexuality.

But I can’t say I’m surprised. We’ve been there before. I used to get really angry but mostly at this point I’m just sad and deflated, and frustrated at how people seem so invested in maintaining the negative compartmentalization of sexuality - and always, the ones who hurt the most are women, queer folks, trans folks, and anyone with non-traditional (whatever that means anyway!) sexuality.

I know these awards don’t matter - I mean WTF is this, anyway? - but it’s not about these particular awards. It’s about a pattern. But I’ve said that before, too.

ETA: Ren, I’m going to need a new Typical file!

Lots of stuff

I have several posts on particular topics saved as drafts, but since I’ll probably never actually write them all, I decided I’ll just do one post addressing all or most of them. Besides, reading my archives (which I’ve been doing periodically over the past week or so, as I slowly go through and tag the old pre-WP entries and update old URLs) made me remember that that’s how I used to write my blog all the time, that’s what comes naturally to me, and that’s why and how I started blogging in the first place. So, back to basics!
Read the full post »

2008 Sex-Positive Journalism Awards Now Seeking Entries

Nationally known journalists and sex-positive advocates to judge “Sexies”

Contact: Susan Wright, 917-848-6544 or Miriam Axel-Lute

To hear some people tell it, all of “the media” is a degenerate, sex-drenched affair. But although there’s plenty of talk about the sex lives of celebrities and a willingness to use a scandal to sell a paper, when you get into the content of actual news stories, things often take a turn for the Puritanical: Soccer moms’ fabricated allegations about kids being exposed to nudity in a hotel hosting a swingers conference get printed as fact and never retracted. Religious minorities are assumed to speak for all religious Americans, or even all Americans, when it comes to whether “abstinence” should be the teen sex-ed gold standard. Usual standards of fairness and objectivity fall prey to reporters and editors’ squeamishness.

In response to this state of affairs, the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom, the Center for Sex and Culture, Babeland, and journalist Miriam Axel-Lute are launching the 2008 Sex-Positive Journalism Awards (the “Sexies”) to promote fair, accurate, and non-sensationalized coverage of sexual topics. The awards are currently accepting entries that meet both high journalistic standards and the Sexies award criteria.

“For the past decade, the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom has dealt with media reports that include sensationalized and false information about sexual issues,” says Susan Wright, NCSF spokesperson. “These articles cause harm by encouraging discrimination and persecution of adults who engage in consensual sexual expression. NCSF is proud to support the Sexies and sex-positive journalism in America.”

“The media’s frequent failure to apply balanced journalistic standards to sex-related topics affects real people’s lives,” says Carol Queen, PhD, co-founder of the Center for Sex and Culture. “A sensationalistic perspective can turn neighbors against each other or make it hard for someone accused of a sex-related offense to get a fair trial. It also means that too many of us worry about whether we’re ‘normal,’ and don’t realize there are sex-positive communities, sources of information, and professionals out there. Just as in the political arena, when the press does not do its job, there is real fallout.”

The winners of the Sex-Positive Journalism Awards will be chosen by an outstanding panel of judges, who have expertise in both journalism and sex-positive advocacy: Dan Savage, author of the popular sex-advice column “Savage Love”; Carol Queen, PhD, writer, speaker, educator, and activist with a doctorate in sexology; Liza Featherstone, journalist and author of “Sex, Lies, and Women’s Magazines” (Columbia Journalism Review); Jack Hafferkamp, a former journalist and journalism professor and co-editor/publisher of LIBIDO: The Journal of Sex and Sensibility; Judith Levine, journalist and author of the award-winning Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children From Sex; Doug Henwood, contributing editor to The Nation; Marty Klein, PhD, certified sex therapist, therapist trainer, and author of America’s War on Sex; and Claire Cavanah, an activist, writer, speaker, and educator in the field of human sexuality and a founder of babeland.com.

“All but the most confident and self-assured among us are affected by the messages we receive about sex,” says Claire Cavanah, co-founder of Babeland.com, a founding sponsor of the Sexies. “It’s freeing to read an article that assumes that most people want a pleasurable, vibrant sex life. Sex-positive media creates space for readers to think about sex in a way that goes against some of the damaging messages that our culture perpetuates.”

“There are journalism awards rewarding good coverage of everything from private aviation to colon cancer,” says Axel-Lute, “but there was nothing out there to reward writers who went the extra mile to be fair and accurate about something as essential to human identity as sexual expression. The Sexies fill that gap.”

The Sexies will be given in four categories: news, feature, opinion, and “unsexy” (the most egregious violation of the Sexies’ criteria). The first three categories have three divisions each: daily general-audience newspaper, weekly or biweekly general-audience newspaper, and online general-audience news publication. [Divisions updated Nov. 7. See press release or criteria page.] The Unsexy award has no divisions. Articles must have been published in 2007. Article series must have started or ended in 2007. Submissions are due by March 23, 2008. Both writers and readers can submit articles for consideration. For full guidelines and a submissions form are available on the website. Winners will receive a cash prize and a plaque. The Sexies are seeking corporate sponsors and individual donations to support our mission. Donations can be made at www.sexies.org/support.html.

No voter apathy here!

Hey, people! You have until 5:00 p.m. EST today to vote in the 2007 Weblog Awards. So hop to it! I don’t want to see any voter apathy around these parts.

Besides, some pretty neato bloggers are nominated, including Belledame, Bitch Ph.D., Shakespeare’s Sister, and the folks at Feministe. (The “Best LGBT Blog” category is the hardest, because Pam’s House Blend, Fetch Me My Axe, and Susie Bright’s Journal are all nominated in that category. All of them deserve the honor, of course!)

Koufax Award nomination

I got a nice surprise this morning via my Technorati search RSS feed… apparently this blog has been nominated for a Koufax Award! The category is “Most Deserving of Wider Recognition,” and my blog is in good company, alongside Bloglandia friends/acquaintances/objects of admiration such as Aunt B, Belledame, Kactus, Little Light, Sage, Yolanda, and many more who are all deserving of wider recognition!

Here’s the official description of the category:

Some bloggers knowingly limit their own readership, either by narrowly focusing their subject matter or employing a writing style that doesn’t appeal to a mass audience. The best of those authors will be included in other award categories. “Most Deserving of Wider Recognition” bloggers are writers who consistently deliver, yet don’t receive the recognition they deserve.

I had completely forgotten that the Koufax nominations were even going on; things like that tend to slip off my radar if I’m not continually nudged via email, RSS, or the like. So to whomever nominated me - a huge THANK YOU!

Oops

Can’t believe I forgot to mention this. A few days ago, Rusty and I finally received our certificate for our Creative Loafing Best of Atlanta award… but here’s how it arrived:

Creative Loafing Best of Atlanta Award - broken

Doh. Try again, CL. Hint: if you’re mailing something made of glass, you might want to put forth a little more effort than just a regular envelope with one layer of bubble wrap.

We’ve emailed them about getting a replacement… this time we’re just going to go down to their office and pick it up in person.

GAPN is DHSOTM

Our fellow hostees at DreamHost have declared that the Georgia Podcast Network shall be the DreamHost Site of the Month for May 2006! What do we win? Several things: 1) a nifty banner to put on the site, 2) a shout-out in the DreamHost newsletter, and 3) the respect and admiration of web users everywhere (or at least somewhere).

Thanks to everyone who voted!

(Cross-posted you know where)