Photos before sleep…

Thanks, Ren. :)

You have inspired me to post more photos. Earlier I was vacillating, thinking, “Oh, but how will it look. It’ll look like I’m too self-centered.” Then I realized, yet again: this is my blog, of course it’s self-centered. That’s the whole point.

So, a few more photos from Level 4 graduation:

Level 4 pole dancing graduation

Level 4 pole dancing graduation

Did I mention Level 5 starts tomorrow?

On a different note, here’s a photo from my now-defunct (well, defunct before it ever was anything else) Project ISM folio.

Kinda-sorta naked on the internet (July 2007)

I know, intellectually anyway, that it was nothing personal that made them ask for pick-up shots… it was the lighting, the blurriness, etc… but all the rejection was starting to get to me. I liked my shots very much, just as they were. I guess it’s just confirmation that need to do this on my terms.

Okay. It’s been a busy day, and I need to get to bed. I’ve been productive today in many ways, but I feel like there’s also a lot of stuff that’s still unresolved. I’m nervous about Sex 2.0 again… I guess I just need to take baby steps.

Same old, same old

A commenter at Feministe said:

As a parent of 2 girls, I’m hoping that I can encourage them to feel empowered by being smart, skilled, happy, powerful, knowledgeable, athletic, etc. Getting positive sexual attention seems pleasant enough, but also seems ’second class.’ Mostly because it relies on ANOTHER person’s judgment, and not on your own internal power.

*sigh*

Where to begin?

As Jenny put it a few weeks ago: “You’re a woman. You may have your intelligence or your sexuality. You may not have both.”

This, of course, is nothing new at all. In fact, it’s so not new that part of me wonders if I should even bother blogging about it. But it never fails to throw me for a loop when self-identified progressives spout the same reductive, dichotomous crap as the status quo conservatives they claim to oppose.

And you know, I bet the father who made the above statement has the best of intentions. Of course he does! He wants his daughters to be valued for more than their looks or their sex appeal; he wants them to be valued as whole people, who have minds and hearts as well as bodies.

And yet, somehow, in the earnestness to ensure that women and girls are valued intellectually and not just physically, the physical gets left behind.

-Well, actually, scratch that; the sexual gets left behind. Because if you’ll notice, in the above quote, the commenter included athletic ability among the list of skills for which he would like his daughters to be admired.

There’s nothing wrong with wanting to be valued as a whole person; I don’t think any reasonable person would argue otherwise. But the thing is, people have bodies. People have sexuality. So, part of being a whole person is valuing those aspects of oneself as well as the mental, emotional, and spiritual. It’s not an either/or game. Compartmentalization of a major part of oneself is in no way holistic.

As a child, these are the lessons I learned: It’s more important to be valued for your mind. The mental is superior to the physical.

And in a lot of ways, that was a good lesson. I have always enjoyed a rich inner life, and have excelled intellectually. I wouldn’t trade either of those things. I certainly wouldn’t have wanted to grow up basing my entire worth on my physical appearance or physical abilities. But, at times, I feel like I went too far in the opposite direction. I was out of touch with my body. I felt guilty about my strong sexual desires, because those were “second class,” to use a phrase from above. Smart girls use their minds. Smart girls have more important things with which to concern themselves. Smart girls don’t. We know this to be true.

Except, smart girls do. And I realized that denying this very strong, powerful, essential part of myself in the name of being “smart” was not very smart at all.

My other beef with the above quote is this part in particular: “Getting positive sexual attention seems pleasant enough, but also seems ’second class.’ Mostly because it relies on ANOTHER person’s judgment, and not on your own internal power.”

Let’s leave aside the “second class” business for now, the connotations of which could make for a whole other post.

What bugs me about this is the language, which was probably used without any specific thought given to it: “Getting positive sexual attention.” Certainly, there is nothing wrong with getting positive sexual attention if that’s what you want. However, using that language as the assumed default here once again casts women as passive recipients. Women are portrayed as being desired; but what about desiring? What about acting? What about seeking, learning, growing, self-actualizing, and all that other hippy-dippy stuff? Owning one’s sexuality (”my body belongs to me”) absolutely does rely on one’s “internal power.” It can even be a source of that power. When women take full, unapologetic ownership of our sexuality, we are reclaiming it from the tired old rule of women’s sexuality being defined by others.

So, while I 100% support women feeling empowered by being smart, skilled, happy, powerful, knowledgeable, and athletic, I equally support women feeling empowered by being sexual and by not denying the body. I support women feeling empowered by all these things, because none of them are mutually exclusive.

I can tell you where to shove that pole

This makes me really angry.

They are making fun of Johnna Mink, making fun of feminism, making fun of pole dancing, and making fun of the crazy idea that maybe, JUST MAYBE, the whole smart/sexy dichotomy is stupid. In 3½ minutes, that video manages to reinforce practically every negative stereotype about pole dancing, women who pole dance, feminists, and more. Overall it’s damn misogynistic.

And yeah, I know, the Colbert Report is all satire. THAT’S WHY WE LOVE IT. But this? This is not making fun of the stereotypes.

This is making fun of women who pole dance, and laughing at the idea of it as something (god forbid) empowering. Same old, same old. The mock-news-segment is called “Difference Makers” - you know, women who matter, women who are doctors, lawyers, politicians… oh, except, there’s a pole dancer! Teehee! Isn’t that funny! They juxtapose a student saying, “The spins are the most empowering” with a shot of her doing a V-spin - and it’s clear we’re all supposed to laugh. And, of course, they make it look easy, like it’s something anyone can just walk up and do. Which is exactly what most people think of pole dancing already.

The message is clear: Johnna Mink and her students aren’t “difference makers.” Not really. (’Cause, see, it’s satire, folks!) The men like ‘em because it’s ALL ABOUT THE MEN (why wouldn’t it be?) and these women are just deluded and stupid. Stupid for pole dancing, and even stupider for finding it empowering.

I just had to let that rant out, because this kind of thing gets me fuming, and also makes me very sad.

And, even though for the most part I’ve given up “pre-emptive notes” at the end of posts, opting instead to simply delete comments from people who are stuck in a horrible Groundhog Day-esque loop of 7th grade, I’m adding one here, just because. So! Don’t come around here and tell me I’m “too sensitive” or I should “get a sense of humor” or I’m “reading too much into it,” etc. As if I’ve never heard any of THAT before. And as if that doesn’t exemplify a very relevant point about women’s voices being trivialized and dismissed.

Okay. Now that that’s out, I can get back to positive things.

Instead of sleeping, I’ll write this

I should be getting ready for bed right about now, but I’m not tired. But I also don’t have enough energy to write a substantive blog post. That annoys me.

Topics that I want to blog about at (relative) length soon:

  • Legalization of prostitution, and how it’s only one piece of the puzzle wrt the stigma associated w/ sex work
  • Via Ren’s suggestion:

    Can we have a female “just say no” to sexual shame week? Get some folk to talk about why some things make them feel shameful and why? What pressures put upon women lead to bad sex, and what things make for good sex? Can we bust out of the moral ball and chain and just get freaky?

    I wouldn’t say I have much of a problem with a “moral ball and chain,” but nonetheless, talking about sex and breaking down the SHAME SHAME SHAME message is always a useful topic to pursue.

So maybe I’ll get to that stuff later this week.

GodDAMN I want a pole in our apartment! I’m trying not to be too impatient, because I know we’ll have one soon. But I am just itching for my very own pole, so I can practice more than once a week. It’s gotten to the point where I can’t help but dance in place when I’m listening to my iPod at work (as much as is possible while sitting in an office chair).

Anyone who says pole dancing is ALL ABOUT TEH MENZ!!1!1 can suck my boots. More and more, I’m discovering that this is an amazing, new, liberating form of self-expression for me. I never in a million years would’ve thought I would be sitting here saying I express myself through dance, and yet here I am! Monday night in class (we’re doing an 8-week “level 3.5″) I felt so inspired and happy watching everyone dance… I thought, “Damn, we all look so GOOD!” Everyone’s gotten to the point now where we’re really starting to go with the flow and improv, and do what we feel, and really put our own signature onto it. Everyone in class is unique, expressive, and beautiful.

10 selections of stripper music I’m liking lately (in no particular order):

  1. The Dope Show - Marilyn Manson
  2. Crazy Bitch - Buckcherry (of course; it’s everyone’s perennial favorite)
  3. London Bridge - Fergie
  4. Voodoo - Godsmack
  5. Touch - Amerie
  6. Early Mornin’ - Britney Spears
  7. Ay Chico (Lengua Afuera) - Pitbull
  8. You Can Do It - Ice Cube
  9. Sin - Nine Inch Nails
  10. Glory Box - Portishead

Not an effective stripper song, but my new favorite song in general, thanks to Steve Eley, is “First of May” by Johnathan Coulton. That’s funny shit.

Okay. I should really try to go to bed now, before I get too carried away with excessive capitalization and italics.

Eventual photo shoot

I’m finally going to get off my ass, confront my fears, and do something I’ve always wanted to do: model for a studio photo shoot! I figure, I walked right through my fears and took up pole dancing - why stop there? How long am I going to let fear hold me back from doing the things I want to do?

Happily, I will be working with kick-ass photographer Frank Lazaro (of Atlanta Urban Photography Exhibit fame). He wants me to scour the internet for stuff I like, and send it to him for ideas; but see, my problem is that when I see something cool (example: check this shit out; Angela rocks), I know it’s cool and I know I like it, but I’m not creative enough to come up with my own ideas. Eh, I’ll just show him a few good photos I’ve seen and let him run with it… the photographer is supposed to have a artistic vision or some shit, right?

Will keep you all posted. Any thoughts/ideas on what I should do or what would look awesome? (Maybe involve podcast equipment, somehow?) It might be weeks before this happens.

Take Back the Blog!

Take Back the Blog! In this week’s Creative Loafing, Cliff Bostock ruminates on the concept of “civil discourse.” I’m using snark quotes there because his point is basically that while a lot of people pay a lot of lip service to the idea, it doesn’t actually happen very much.

Being an eternal optimist, I’m confident that civil discourse is possible - but only if those of us who are interested in it put our collective foot down and refuse to tolerate abuse, hate speech, threats, silencing, and other such bullshit that most certainly does not fall under the umbrella of Free Speech.

Further, this means wishy-washy assholes like Kos who’re showing their true colors in light of the recent discussions about online bullying and such, should continue to be called on their bullshit.

Civil discourse does not preclude disagreement, emotion, and anger. Nor does it mean never dropping F-bombs or constantly being that saccharine, passive-aggressive version of “nice.” It doesn’t mean never calling someone an asshole; if they’re behaving like an asshole, they should be told as much. What it means is not threatening people; not silencing people; not mistaking ad hominem attacks for “debate;” giving people the benefit of the doubt if they haven’t been behaving like overgrown 2-year-olds; and remembering, first and foremost, that behind the words on the screen is a person with feelings.

Frankly I don’t think we can accomplish this goal by letting bullies walk all over us. Trying to take the high road and ignore their childish antics is fine, so long as the actions/words in question are merely childish antics. When it gets to the point of completely derailing conversation, trying to take over someone else’s space - and certainly when it gets to the level of threats - silence is not sufficient.

The word “threat” here refers to threats of physical violence as well as threats of blackmail - e.g., “If you don’t do what I want you to do, I will reveal personal information about you that could result in potential harm (e.g., loss of a job) to you and your family.”

So, getting back to Cliff Bostock’s column… What spurred me to write about this particular approach on Take Back the Blog! day was this:

I have learned that the only thing bigots understand is being treated with the contempt they treat others.

It makes sense, because really, why try to be reasonable and rational with a person who has proven to be neither reasonable nor rational?

And I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out that an important thing to keep in mind, of course, is being mindful of the line between putting the assholes in their place, and not expending too much energy on them. This is a line that I think all of us are constantly redrawing, and we should feel free to approach one another about where that line should be. I, for one, refuse to let would-be abusers keep me from living my life and being the change I seek in the world.