What’s kinky, indeed

It’s been very interesting reading people’s definitions of kinky. (Keep ‘em coming!) The definitions are varied, but most of the commenters so far at least seem to agree that “kinky” is subjective.

What fascinates me, though, is that there does seem to be some concept of a generally-accepted meaning of the word, nebulous though it may be when you actually try to pin it down. But when people make your garden-variety stupid “oh, so-and-so is into the kinky stuff!” joke, there seems to be at least a general understanding of what that refers to. (Or not? Am I totally off base here? This is the impression I get.)

Maybe it’s pointless to try to reconcile individual’s personal definitions of/ruminations on the word with a larger cultural meaning, but this stuff fascinates me. I guess it’s the linguistics nerd in me.

I feel like in general, “kinky” is taken to mean “weird,” but “weird” includes stuff that actually isn’t weird by a lot of people’s standards, when you actually ask them. Which is why I think this general definition comes from a cultural level, which can be slower to change than the minds of individuals.

Am I making any sense here? I’m making sense to myself, but I feel like I’m probably making no sense whatsoever to anyone else.

Anyway, I’ll move right along and talk about what kinky means to me. Honestly, when I hear the word “kinky” or that someone is “into kink” or that a place is “kink-friendly” or whatever, I think of BDSM. I wonder how many other people equate kink and BDSM to some degree? I think I do it because I know quite a few people who are into BDSM to some degree and they do tend to use the terms interchangeably - or at least that’s how it appears to me, as a non-BDSMer looking in.

So to my mind, “kinky” tends to involve some or all of the following: leather, corsets, elaborate costumes, various props, bondage, domination/submission, safe words, not necessarily any actual fucking, most likely the term “scene,” and possibly the term “aftercare.”

It seems like in the thread where people were offering definitions, a lot of people were defining kinky the way I’d define sex-positive. I have to admit when I hear about kink this or kink-friendly that, sometimes a little red flag goes up, and I wonder if this is going to be my scene (ha!) or not. Look, I have nothing against BDSM and all that stuff; some of my best friends, an’ all. I’m just not into it. As a friend who shall remain nameless (unless s/he chooses to self-identify!) said about first learning about BDSM: “When’s the part where you have sex?” That’s basically how I feel about it. The whole dom/sub thing, and the props and the costumes and whatnot, does absolutely nothing for me. Now, I certainly like handcuffs from time to time, or being smacked on the ass with a belt, and other assorted fun stuff. But there’s usually fucking going on at the same time… I guess that’s the kicker for me.

Now before any of my BDSM-loving blog associates read this and get all worked up because I’m attacking your preferences - hey, you don’t have to. ‘Cause I’m not. Whatever anyone is into is awesome, for them! To my mind, the most important thing is for people to have the kind of sex they enjoy, and - I’ll borrow a phrase from the BDSM crowd here - to always be safe, sane, and consensual.

What’s kinky?

So in light of the recently-declared kink week, and my remark that I think kink is subjective, I want to start things off with a question for all you readers - even the lurkers! Come on, click on over from your RSS reader.

What does “kinky” mean to you? Is it particular acts? (If so, which ones?) Is it more of a mindset kind of thing? How do you understand that word in your personal lexicon?

I’m looking forward to hearing people’s answers!

Heh

In attempting to catch up on some blog reading, I see Ren has declared this to be kink week!

Now, I think there’s a spectrum of kinkiness, and the definition varies from person to person. One person’s kinky is another person’s vanilla. I’ll try to post about my thoughts on this more tomorrow (or at some point this week), and maybe even talk about some personal kinks. So a heads up to my mom, who I know reads this no matter what she might say in protest, that she should either stop reading or deal with the fact that yeah, I’m an adult who has sex.

Stay tuned!

The similarities keep stacking up

Here’s another way in which the Religious Reich and the Patriarchy Blamers are eerily similar. They both have extreme difficulty understanding a very basic concept: consent. The Patriarchy Blamers conflate BDSM with rape, and the religious fundies conflate homosexuality with (take your pick) bestiality, pedophilia, and/or incest, depending on their degree of craziness. Oh, and they probably conflate BDSM with rape, too.

Consent isn’t a very difficult concept to grasp, which is why it’s puzzling that so many people in each camp grapple with it so. Rape victims did not consent to sex. Animals and children cannot consent to sex. What’s left to discuss? And, preemptively: don’t try some bull like, “Well, what if they consent to go out and start a bar fight?” If anyone involved didn’t consent, then your argument just died an early death.

It also amuses exasperates me when people say things like, “But BDSM is dangerous! They might think no means yes, and end up really hurting someone!” Anyone who says that obviously doesn’t know squat about BDSM; otherwise, one of the most basic elements - safe words - would render such a statement moot.

And for the record (because I know plenty of you are wondering, even though you won’t admit it), I think BDSM is kind of silly, but why would I give two shits about what other consenting adults want to do?